by Jake Johnson, Common Dreams: http://climateandcapitalism.com/2016/10/03/if-nature-is-sacred-capitalism-is-wicked/
In his remarkable study When Corporations Rule the World,
David Korten recounts a meeting he attended ahead of the 2012 United
Nations Conference on Sustainable Development in Rio de Janeiro,
The meeting was led, Korten notes, by indigenous leaders who
were anxious about the direction in which global environmental policy
was being steered. They were also, quite justifiably, worried about who
was doing the steering.
“In the conference’s preparatory meetings,” Korten writes,
“corporatists … proposed that to save nature we must put a price on
It’s a familiar story: capitalism, we are often told, can be made
green. Incentives can be established. The corporations previously
leading the way in pollution, plunder, and exploitation can, with a few
adjustments, become the world’s leaders in the development of clean
energy and pave the way to a sustainable future.
As is often the case, it is those who have seen up close the harm
done by corporate greed who most quickly see through the facade. “These
indigenous leaders recognized that this proposal would accelerate the
monopolization by the richest among us of the resources essential to
human life,” Korten observed. “Their position was clear and
unbending. Earth is our Sacred Mother and she is not for sale. Her care
is our sacred responsibility. Her fruits must be equitably and
responsibly shared by all.”
This conflict between capitalism and the environment is not, of course, uncharted terrain. Naomi Klein, in her bestselling book This Changes Everything,
argues that an economic order predicated on the relentless pursuit of
profit is incompatible with a world in which natural resources are used
with the necessary care and restraint. It truly is, as the subtitle of Klein’s book notes, “capitalism versus the climate.” Terrifyingly, capitalism is winning.
Under capitalism, everything is a business
opportunity - catastrophes, from tsunamis to wars, are no exception. In
fact, as Klein documented in her earlier book The Shock Doctrine,
disasters are not viewed by business leaders as problems to be solved;
rather, they are seen as circumstances of which they must take
But capitalism does not merely wait on the sidelines for these
opportunities to arise. “An economic system that requires constant
growth, while bucking almost all serious attempts at environmental
regulation, generates a steady stream of disasters all on its own,
whether military, ecological or financial,” Klein notes.
Disasters of the kind Klein describes have become commonplace during
the neoliberal period, in which markets have been deregulated,
public services have been privatized, governments have become
unresponsive to the needs of the citizenry, and trade accords have
empowered corporations to run roughshod over sovereign nations in
pursuit of profit.
The exploitation of the global poor in the process is
a given - as Arundhati Roy observed in a piece condemning the
government of India for sanctioning the displacement of indigenous
communities in an effort to clear the way for corporate mining projects,
it’s now just “business as usual.” “The battle lines,” she wrote, “are clearly drawn.”
Similar such cases, in which poor people are seen as disposable and their communities as capitalism’s waste dumps, abound.
In North Texas, the “birthplace of modern hydraulic fracturing,”
residents have been suffering the consequences of living near the
operations of the oil and gas industry for years - consequences that
include, but aren’t limited to, heart problems, breathing troubles, and
birth defects. “I’ve been trying to sell my house,” one
resident told the Center for Public Integrity. “I’ve got to get out of
here or I’m going to die.”
In 2015, Scientific American reported an unsurprising fact,
by now almost a truism: It is the poor, disproportionately poor people
of color, who have been forced to bear the brunt of the often
devastating ills imposed by fracking. Unsurprising, and far from new:
“Residents in these poor counties have been under assault for
generations,” Alex Lotorto of Energy Justice said.
The water crisis in Flint, Michigan, has been thoroughly documented,
and rightly so. Less prominent has been coverage of East Chicago,
Indiana, where for decades residents’ homes have rested on
lead-contaminated soil. As the New York Times reported in
August, “the companies responsible for the contamination” were sued by
the Environmental Protection Agency in 2009, but this is little comfort
for the more than 1,000 people - including over 600 children - now
forced to find a new place to live.
It is impossible to quantify the harm done in such circumstances;
but, needless to say, those responsible for the harm harbor few qualms
about their actions. One executive reportedly said aloud what most
already knew was the case: poor communities are intentionally targeted
because they lack the resources to mount effective resistance.
Thankfully, we have seen in recent weeks that this doesn’t have to be
the case - that, when the opposition is sufficiently organized,
corporate plunder can be obstructed. Though under-reported in mainstream
outlets, the fight over the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline
provides a case in point.
North Dakota’s Standing Rock Sioux tribe, joined by many other tribes
and activists, has for weeks engaged in direct action in response
to Energy Transfer Partners’ desire to move forward with the project,
arguing that it would place at risk both the water supply and sacred
land. State officials have responded with striking intensity.
“In recent weeks, the state has militarized my reservation, with road
blocks and license-plate checks, low-flying aircraft and racial
profiling of Indians,” wrote David Archambault II, the chairman of the
Standing Rock Sioux tribe. “The local sheriff and the pipeline company
have both called our protest ‘unlawful,’ and Gov. Dalrymple has declared
a state of emergency.”
Last week, as Common Dreams reported, over twenty protesters were arrested in “a military-style raid” which “interrupted a peaceful prayer ceremony.”
Far from dispiriting, such a vicious response to nonviolent
demonstrations of this kind show how threatening organized protest is to
corporations and their partners in government; though they claim to
fear chaos, disorder, and violence, what corporate forces really fear
is mass solidarity expressed through courageous acts of civil
Of course, the protests at Standing Rock are not isolated acts, and
they are, as Sarah Jaffe observes, “bigger than one pipeline.”
“We all have similar struggles, where this dependency this world has
on fossil fuels is affecting and damaging Mother Earth,” David
Archambault II told Jaffe. “It is the indigenous peoples who are
standing up with that spirit, that awakening of that spirit and saying,
‘It is time to protect what is precious to us.'” Never has such action been more necessary.
The science tells us that we have reached a critical moment; as Naomi
Klein has argued, “no gradual, incremental options are now available to
us.” Researchers agree, and some have joined the call for “radical
change” that goes far beyond the agreements reached in Paris.
But such radical change cannot take place in the absence of mass
anti-capitalist movements that recognize the interplay between economic
interests and environmental degradation. The leaders of the struggle for
a sustainable, equitable future will not, therefore, be corporate
executives and billionaire philanthropists, with their deep ideological
commitments to the economic order that so enriched them and their
businesses. Rather, leading the way will be the indigenous communities
that have for so long been forced to endure relentless dispossession in
the name of business.
As Noam Chomsky has observed, “The countries that have driven
indigenous populations to extinction or extreme marginalization are
racing toward destruction.” And, he adds, “countries with large and
influential indigenous populations are well in the lead in seeking to
preserve the planet.”
If “water is life,” as the Sioux saying goes, an economic system that
poisons water for profit is life’s contradiction - it is a system of
destruction, a “suicide economy,” that must be dismantled. “Ultimately, the ‘success’ or otherwise of the Paris climate talks
appears unlikely to challenge the fundamental dynamics underlying the
"Dramatic decarbonization based around limits upon
consumption, economic growth, and corporate influence are not open for discussion,” conclude scholars Christopher Wright and Daniel Nyberg.
“Until this changes, the dominance of corporate capitalism will ensure
the continued rapid unraveling of our habitable climate.”
Tuesday, October 4, 2016
Tuesday, September 27, 2016
|(Photo credit: Wikipedia)|
Current greenhouse gas concentrations could warm the world 3-7℃ (and on average 5℃) over coming millennia. That’s the finding of a paper published in Nature today.
The research, by Carolyn Snyder, reconstructed temperatures over the past 2 million years. By investigating the link between carbon dioxide and temperature in the past, Snyder made new projections for the future.
The Paris climate agreement seeks to limit warming to a “safe” level of well below 2℃ and aim for 1.5℃ by 2100. The new research shows that even if we stop emissions now, we’ll likely surpass this threshold in the long term, with major consequences for the planet.
What is climate sensitivity?
How much the planet will warm depends on how temperature responds to greenhouse gas concentrations. This is known as “climate sensitivity”, which is defined as the warming that would eventually result (over centuries to thousands of years) from a doubling of CO₂ concentrations in the atmosphere.
The measure of climate sensitivity used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) estimates that a doubling of CO₂ will lead to 1.5-4.5℃ warming. A doubling of CO₂ levels from before the Industrial Revolution (280 parts per million) to 560ppm would likely surpass the stability threshold for the Antarctic ice sheet.
As the world warms, it triggers changes in other systems, which in turn cause the world to warm further. These are known as “amplifying feedbacks”. Some are fast, such as changes in water vapour, clouds, aerosols and sea ice.
Others are slower. Melting of the large ice sheets, changes in the distribution of forests, plants and ecosystems, and methane release from soils, tundra or ocean sediments may begin to come into play on time scales of centuries or less.
Other research has shown that during the mid-Pliocene epoch (about 4.5 million years ago) atmospheric CO₂ levels of about 365-415ppm were associated with temperatures about 3-4 °C warmer than before the Industrial Revolution. This suggests that the climate is more sensitive than we thought.
This is concerning because since the 18th century CO₂ levels have risen from around 280ppm to 402ppm in April this year. The levels are currently rising at around 3ppm each year, a rate unprecedented in 55 million years. This could lead to extreme warming over the coming millennia.
More sensitive than we thoughtThe new paper recalculates this sensitivity again - and unfortunately the results aren’t in our favour. The study suggests that stabilisation of today’s CO₂ levels would still result in 3-7℃ warming, whereas doubling of CO₂ will lead to 7-13℃ warming over millennia.
The research uses proxy measurements for temperature (such as oxygen isotopes and magnesium-calcium ratios from plankton) and for CO₂ levels, calculated for every 1,000 years back to 2 million years ago.
Some other major findings include:
The Earth cooled gradually to about 1.2 million years ago, followed by an increase in the size of ice sheets around 0.9 million years ago, and then followed by around 100,000-year-long glacial cycles.
Over the last 800,000 years, and particularly during glacial cycles, atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations and global temperature were closely linked.
The study shows that for every 1℃ of global average warming, Antarctica warms by 1.6℃.
So what does all this mean for the future?
Global warming past and future, triggered initially by either changes in solar radiation or by greenhouse gas emissions, is driven mainly by amplifying feedbacks such as warming oceans, melting ice, drying vegetation in parts of the continents, fires and methane release.
Current CO₂ levels of around 400ppm, combined with methane (rising toward 1,900 parts per billion) and nitric oxide (around 310ppb), are already driving such feedbacks.
According to the new paper, such greenhouse gas levels are committing the Earth to extreme rises of temperature over thousands of years, with consequences consistent with the large mass extinctions.
The IPCC suggests warming will increase steadily as greenhouse gases increase. But the past shows there will likely be abrupt shifts, local reversals and tipping points.
Abrupt freezing events, known as “stadials”, follow peak temperatures in the historical record. These are thought to be related to the Mid-Atlantic Ocean Current. We’re already seeing marked cooling of ocean regions south of Greenland, which may herald collapse of the North Atlantic Current.
As yet we don’t know the details of how different parts of the Earth will respond to increasing greenhouse gases through both long-term warming and short-term regional or local reversals (stadials).
Unless humanity develops methods for drawing down atmospheric CO₂ on a scale required to cool the Earth to below 1.5°C above pre-industrial temperature, at the current rate of CO₂ increase of 3ppm per year we are entering dangerous uncharted climate territory.
Andrew Glikson, Earth and paleo-climate scientist, Australian National University.
This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.