Showing posts with label Agroecology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Agroecology. Show all posts

Friday, January 2, 2015

VIDEO: Farms in Urbanity

by Plus, Vimeo: http://vimeo.com/73497012

FARMS IN URBANITY from Poki on Vimeo.

Wednesday, March 19, 2014

Taking the Permaculture Path to Community Resilience

Cover of "Permaculture: A Practical Guide...
by Steve Whitman, Sharon Ferguson, originally published by Sustainable Cities Collective, Resilience.org: http://www.resilience.org/stories/2014-03-18/taking-the-permaculture-path-to-community-resilience

What permaculturalists are doing is the most important activity that any group is doing on the planet. We don't know what the details of a truly sustainable future are going to be like, but we need options, we need people experimenting in all kinds of ways and permaculturalists are one of the critical groups doing that - David Suzuki, quoted in HopeDance 2009.
 
We need to see our communities as the ecosystems they are and consider how the components of these places can be better integrated.
 
Permaculture is a holistic, integrated system analysis and design tool that very few planners are using. Planners need to know about permaculture and use it as a framework to guide our communities.
 
Planners as Change Agents and Ecosystem Designers
 
Planners serve as change agents in their communities, regions, and ultimately on a global scale. As a profession we play a pivotal role in facilitating dialogue about pressing issues that will impact our collective futures. 
 
This includes educating the public on a range of topics from public health to climate change and energy concerns, economics, and many others.
 
Although many in the profession would not recognize this role, we are ecosystem designers as well. Our comprehensive plans and regulations guide development and redevelopment efforts. 
 
These projects result in places that serve as ecosystems for humans and other species, but all too often they do not serve the community and the users as well as they could.
 
With our economy and energy futures in flux, now is an opportunity to transition to more ecological and robust models of development that will serve our communities and all species more effectively in the future. 
 
What does this look like? It will look different in each of our communities due to our unique geography and history, the needs of our population, and ultimately the goals we set. However, we can all use the same framework and some of the same tools to get to our chosen futures.
 
Planners must look more expansively at developing local initiatives. We have access to many of the solutions we need locally.
 
Permaculture offers a pathway to a positive transition beyond sustainability to resilient communities. Permaculture is an approach to designing human settlements and agricultural systems that are modeled on the relationships found in natural ecologies.
 
A Permaculture Primer
 
Planners are the facilitators of both long-range planning efforts, and short-term review and permitting activities in our communities. The adoption of the permaculture framework is overdue.
 
Permaculture is considered one of the most holistic, integrated system analysis and design tools in the world, and yet very few planners are using it.
 
In the 1970s, while working in Australia, Bill Mollison and David Holmgren coined the term permaculture by combining the words "permanent" and "agriculture." 
 
The notion of permaculture was based on the work of farmers and scholars documenting the potential for "permanent agriculture" in the early 1900s, the knowledge and wisdom of indigenous peoples worldwide, and an interest in systems thinking. 
 
The term permaculture was then expanded to also stand for "permanent culture" to incorporate the social aspects that are needed in a sustainable system.
 
Permaculture is fast becoming one of the most effective design methodologies for attaining sustainability worldwide. 
 
Although rooted in horticulture and agriculture, permaculture draws from many disciplines including ecology, appropriate technology, architecture, and international development. 
 
Examples of applying concepts of permaculture abound in the United States, and permaculture design courses are taught on a routine basis. 
 
There is apparently no entity keeping track of the number of permaculture course graduates, but we conservatively estimate that at least 100,000 people in the United States have graduated from certificate courses in permaculture.
 
At this point, you may be wondering what is the difference between sustainable community planning and permaculture.
 
Permaculture differs from sustainable community planning efforts in that it seeks to integrate the proposed sustainable elements (e.g., water catchment, renewable energy, district heating, food growing, waste recycling, transportation, etc.) into a whole system that operates efficiently so that the number of inputs are minimized but outputs attained are maximized. 
 
The goal is to create an ecosystem that provides as many useful products and functions out of the system as the designer's abilities allow while healing the planet. 
 
A maxim of design is that the yield of a system is theoretically unlimited (or only limited by the imagination and information of the designer) (Mollison 1998).
 
Permaculture is much more than organic agriculture. It integrates buildings and their landscapes, and permaculture projects incorporate all of their elements into a comprehensive and mutually beneficial design. 
 
Each element is analyzed to ensure that it serves multiple functions, and is placed with a strong relationship to the other elements in the system to maximize productivity.
 
Permaculture designs are inspired by natural patterns and range from small urban park retrofits to mixed land-use subdivisions and large rural farms. 
 
During the last two decades we have seen the formation of intentional communities including co-housing developments, many of which are designed in accordance with permaculture principles. One example of this is Nubanusit Neighborhood and Farm, discussed below.
 
Resilience and Transition
 
As we consider using permaculture in our planning efforts, resilience should be the goal. Resilience refers to the ability of a system to hold together and maintain its ability to function in the face of change and shocks from the outside. 
 
Resilient communities possess the ability to withstand external shocks and can bounce back quickly from sudden environmental or economic changes. Planners need to place resilience building at the heart of any plans we make for the future (Hopkins 2008).
 
This is the approach being used in "transition town" efforts around the globe, a movement that itself was born from a permaculture design effort. 
 
The transition town movement is a response to the twin challenges of peak oil and climate change. Transition initiatives are based on assumptions (among others) that life with dramatically lower energy consumption is inevitable, and that our settlements and communities currently lack the resilience to enable them to weather the severe energy shocks that will accompany peak oil. 
 
Transition town efforts focus on rebuilding local agriculture and food production, localizing energy production, rediscovering local building materials, and rethinking how we manage waste, all of which build resilience. Currently, in the United States alone, there are at least 115 official Transition Town Initiatives (Transition United States; Transition Network).
 
Applicable at Any Scale
 
How can permaculture be utilized by planners to create communities that are more resilient to outside shocks from the global economy, climate change, and energy issues? 
 
There are many points of intervention. Permaculture tools and strategies can, in fact, be applied at many different scales: home gardens, city blocks, farms, villages, cities, and entire nations. Four brief examples illustrate the range of applying permaculture tools and strategies. 
 
Rainwater Harvesting
 
Rainwater harvesting is one example of applying permaculture principles. Urban strategies for harvesting rainwater through the capture of street runoff grew out of the work of permaculturist Brad Lancaster in Tucson, Arizona. 
 
Lancaster and his brother bought a rundown house in Tucson and under the cover of night they cut through the curbs along the adjoining right-of-way to harvest the stormwater runoff rather than let it be lost to the storm sewer. 
 
The runoff was captured along both sides of the street and directed to tree wells. The before-and-after photographs of vegetation shown in Figures 1 and 2, taken from the same vantage point, are a powerful statement of the potential of permaculture strategies.
 
City officials in Tucson saw Lancaster's resourceful innovation. He then began working with city engineers to convince them of the viability of the practice. City staff then improved upon the design of the curb cuts and, as a result, the capture of stormwater runoff was legalized on residential streets.
 
Public right-of-way, pre-water harvesting
Figure 1: Public right-of-way, pre-water harvesting (1994). Source: Brad Lancaster.
 
Public right-of-way, post-water harvesting and planting
Figure 2: Public right-of-way, post-water harvesting and planting (2006). Source: Brad Lancaster.
 
Nubanusit Neighborhood and Farm
 
An example application of permaculture is Nubanusit Neighborhood and Farm located in Peterborough, New Hampshire.
 
Nubanusit is a 70-acre property (see Figure 3) designed using permaculture design and cohousing practices to create a dense village of residential units, shared community space, and agricultural land while preserving the balance of the property in its natural state. 
 
The community is composed of LEED-certified structures and includes a range of appropriate technologies including district heating and photovoltaics (see solar panels in Figure 4). 
 
The project was possible because of a new community comprehensive plan and regulatory changes that encouraged open space developments and mixed land uses.
 
Nubanusit Neighborhood and Farm
Figure 3: Nubanusit Neighborhood and Farm. Source: Nubanusit Neighborhood & Farm.
 
Residents of Nubanusit have now started installing photovoltaic panels on some of the units to increase the energy being produced onsite
Figure 4: Residents of Nubanusit have now started installing photovoltaic panels on some of the units to increase the energy being produced onsite.
 
Comprehensive Planning in Bloomington, Indiana
 
When creating comprehensive plans we should broadly consider permaculture and resilience. In some of the more cutting-edge comprehensive planning efforts in the United States, these issues are only addressed (at best) in separate peak oil or climate adaptation plans. 
 
In communities that do address these larger picture issues in their long-range planning documents, there is often a lack of implementation via land-use regulations. 
 
A good example of implementation is Bloomington, Indiana. In Bloomington, a plan titled "Redefining Prosperity: Energy Descent and Community Resilience" was adopted in December 2009 with an emphasis on creating food security. 
 
That effort is based on both permaculture and transition efforts and includes a range of recommendations, from creating a centralized composting system to removing and reducing the legal, institutional, and cultural barriers to farming within and around the city.
 
Systems Approach for Cuba
 
The collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 crushed the Cuban economy. Having been entirely dependent on fossil fuels from the Soviet Union, Cuba then had to deal with severe shortages of petroleum. 
 
The loss of support from the Soviet Union had a crippling effect on the transportation, industrial, and agricultural systems in Cuba. Along with fossil fuel loss, Cuba suffered an 80 percent loss of food imports, resulting in widespread food shortages. 
 
Cubans were forced to explore every avenue possible to increase their food production without benefit of fuel for farm equipment or inputs of chemical fertilizer (Cuba History.org).
 
In 1993, a group of Australian permaculturists arrived in Cuba in response to the economic collapse and taught their techniques, which were soon implemented in urban food growing schemes across the nation. 
 
Much of the success of Cuba's urban agriculture and food security has been attributed to the introduction of permaculture. The city of Havana now produces more than 60 percent of its fruit and vegetables within the city, owing to the techniques taught by those first permaculturists (Morgan, Murphy, and Quinn 2006).
 
Demonstration and Education
 
Across the country, there are examples of established and emerging permaculture demonstration projects. We need more of these. 
 
We need to guide the implementation of permaculture demonstration projects on municipal properties and elsewhere. To do so, however, planners need to get trained to engage people and assist localities in thinking about permaculture. 
 
Planners can even complete a permaculture design certification program. The permaculture design certificate course is a minimum of 72 hours with a core curriculum that is used internationally. 
 
Courses are offered regularly in most states and around the world, or you can take the course in a place that you always wanted to visit and combine the course with a vacation. 
 
The format for these offerings range from two-week residential offerings to weekend formats spread out over a season or two. The permaculture design certificate is an internationally recognized credential for professionals.
 
Conclusion

Permaculture is a systems approach to planning for the future that goes well beyond smart growth, low-impact development, habitat protection, complete streets, and other initiatives that are often viewed as separate entities.
 
Permaculture incorporates these and other concepts more holistically in a way that creates an integrated system. Enabling and incentivizing projects that help our communities become more resilient is important and will support our local economies and ecosystems while building local capacity.
 
Permaculture designs are guided by a set of ethics and principles that can be used at any scale. Ideally, this holistic ecosystem approach will become commonplace in regulatory and non-regulatory initiatives. 
 
We need permaculture as a framework to better serve all populations, build community, retrofit infrastructure, and support the local economy. We need to see our communities as the ecosystems they are and consider how the components of these places can be better integrated. 
 
For instance, certain landscapes can be designed to require little maintenance, provide clean, infiltrated stormwater, create valuable habitat, and provide edible foods for people. 
 
That outcome would be a better asset to the community than what is currently required in most places. So, planners, be a change agent in your communities!
 
References
 
Cuba History.org. "History of Cuban Nation, from Colonial Days to the Present."www.cubahistory.org/ Accessed April 21, 2012.

HopeDance. August 20, 2009. "Quotes about Permaculture." HopeDance: Celebrating Transition, Opportunity & Resilience. www.hopedance.orghttp://www.hopedance.org/index.php/home/soul-news/996 Accessed April 21, 2012.
 
Hopkins, Rob. 2008. The Transition Handbook: From Oil Dependency to Local Resilience. White River Junction, Vt.: Chelsea Green Publishing.
 
Lancaster, Brad. "Rainwater Harvesting for Drylands and Beyond."
www.harvestingrainwater.com Accessed April 21, 2012.

Mollison, Bill. 1988. Permaculture: A Designer's Manual. Tyalgum, Australia: Tagari Publications.
 
Morgan, Faith, Murphy, Eugene "Pat," and Quinn, Megan. 2006. "The Power of Community: How Cuba Survived Peak Oil." Documentary.

Nubanusit Neighborhood & Farm: A Cohousing Community in Pertersborough, NH (website).www.peterboroughcohousing.org. Accessed April 21, 2012.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, January 12, 2014

Break Agriculture's Chemical Monopolies to Free Our Food

Agriculture
Agriculture (Photo credit: thegreenpages)
by Michel Pimbert, Coventry University

Current farming methods rely too much on expensive chemicals such as fertiliser and pesticides; agroecology combines the best of ecological science and farmers’ knowledge to develop more sustainable food and farming.

This is not some fringe theory - agroecology has been discussed in the UK parliament, and an Agroecology Strategy Bill to be presented to MPs will be launched at the Oxford Real Farming Conference that starts today.

The UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food has argued that agroecology can double food production in entire regions within ten years, while mitigating climate change and alleviating rural poverty.

And a recent UNCTAD report also made the benefits more visible for mainstream policy makers. However, the term agroecology is now frequently used to mean very different things.

The French Minister of Agriculture declared his intention to have France become Europe’s “champion of agroecology”. But his government’s vision is radically different from that of French civil society and farmers' organisations.

Instead of merely promoting no-till farming methods with herbicide sprays, these organisations call for an agroecological approach that brings producers and consumers closer, boosts employment, the development of a solidarity-based economy, and diverse nutritious foods.

This emphasis on locally controlled food systems is at the heart of a radical agenda for food sovereignty in Europe that transforms the system, rather than conforms to the current model.

But this transformation will not happen spontaneously. Change in Europe ultimately depends on the power of citizens to redirect public investments and policies that limit the spread of agroecology for sustainable food and farming.

Re-localising food

A growing number of initiatives in Europe aim to re-connect producers with consumers, using short food chains that supply local food.

According to a recent EU commissioned study, short food chains generate great social and economic benefits. They create a sense of community by building trust and social bonds. They also create jobs and strengthen local economies because producers keep a higher share of their food’s value.

The environmental impact of short food chains can be mixed. Greenhouse gas emissions can be high if electricity and fuel have to be sourced from far away, for example. So a major challenge is to find new ways of re-integrating food, energy, water and waste systems in circular models.

The overall focus is on doing more with less: widespread recycling and reuse; bringing production and consumption back from a global food supply chain to a more local, decentralised food web.

From house clusters, municipalities, and whole cities, to semi-urban areas beyond city hinterlands linked to nearby farms and countryside.

Free the seeds, reclaim the land

Ensuring biodiversity-rich and change-resistant farming depends on unrestricted access to a wide range of seeds that are not proprietary products of big corporations.

But European seed regulations and Plant Breeders Rights encourage uniformity across farm landscapes by restricting the free exchange of seeds.

While this benefits seed companies, it hampers our ability to develop the more genetically diverse farming systems we need to adapt to climate change. Changes to the law are urgently needed to liberate seeds from corporate control, and strengthen farmers' rights.

Land ownership in Europe is also highly unequal. There are some 12m farms in the EU, but large farms of 100 hectares or more, representing only 3% of the total number, nevertheless control 50% of all farmed land.

For young people trying to enter farming, high land prices and an increasingly speculative market have made it even more difficult. We need a pan-European political process to reverse the concentration of land ownership.

But a number of citizens’ initiatives are taking land off the market in order to allow farmers to enter or stay in farming.

For example Terre de Liens (“ties to the land”) in France has bought more 2,000 hectares of farmland since 2007, held in perpetuity for the sake of current and future generations. Land is then let to farmers who largely farm organically and sell through short food webs that create jobs and wealth in the local economy.

Citizen action

Citizens need to change the way public money is spent. For example, funds are required to build the infrastructure of decentralised food systems: local abattoirs, mills, food processing facilities, renewable energy generation, and water treatment.

Working with allies in local government, public money can be redirected into procurement schemes that favour farmers using agroecological methods and short food chains to deliver healthy, local food to schools, hospitals, and office canteens.

For example, in both Italy and Scotland, local authorities have promoted local producers by finding ways to bypass the “non-discrimination” EU regulatory constraints. Only local products are used to prepare school meals in several Italian towns.

Another challenge is to change research priorities towards developing sustainable food systems. The challenge is to increase public funding for long-neglected agroecological research and democratise how such research is governed.

Citizens - farmers - should be more involved in defining strategic research priorities and policies. More emphasis needs to be placed on forms of social organisation and education that encourage direct democracy and partnerships, including farmers’ movements and their innovation networks..

In a globalised world, new trade rules will be needed to protect local food systems and local businesses, and new supply management policies to reduce wasteful production and consumption and connect farms to fair markets. But this must not simply tweak the system.

This is where a greater convergence between agroecology, food sovereignty, the solidarity economy, and degrowth movements can help.

Localised, circular systems based on agroecology can strengthen food sovereignty, democracy, and cultural diversity in Europe.

Given the threats of climate change, peak oil, water scarcity, food supply, and steeply rising unemployment in the EU, piecemeal solutions that perpetuate “business as usual” will not do.

Michel Pimbert receives funding from the Swiss Development Cooperation, The Salvia Foundation, Swedish Sida, and the EU.
The Conversation

This article was originally published at The Conversation. Read the original article.
Enhanced by Zemanta